Responding to Dr. White and TurretinFan Monday

4 Flares 4 Flares ×
T

O SATISFY ANY CURIOSITY some of my read­ers might have, I have lis­tened to Dr. James White’s and TurretinFan’s response on the Divid­ing Line to this blog arti­cle of mine.  TurretinFan’s writ­ten response, com­posed some­what in the form of an adden­dum, may be found here.

I thought that both responses were very thor­ough and very cour­te­ous.  For that I am appre­cia­tive.  I did, how­ever, note sev­eral instances in which they mis­un­der­stood (and thus, even if unin­ten­tion­ally, mis­rep­re­sented) some of my key arguments.

The dif­fer­ences between Catholics and Protes­tants on the issue of sola scrip­tura are big, and they are very impor­tant, and both Dr. White and Tur­ret­inFan addressed them­selves to these cru­cial points of dis­agree­ment that trag­i­cally con­tinue to keep Christ’s dis­ci­ples divided.  For that rea­son, I intend to write a response to both of these gen­tle­men that is as thor­ough and seriously-reasoned as their own.

Lord will­ing, it will be pub­lished on Mon­day, along with Part 3 of the “Men as Trees Walk­ing” series.

St. Paul says, “Let your speech always be gra­cious, sea­soned with salt, so that you may know how you ought to answer every one” (Colos­sians 4:6).  Once again, I thank Dr. White and Tur­ret­inFan for uphold­ing that very Chris­t­ian stan­dard for disagreement.

4 Flares Twit­ter 1 Face­book 3 Google+ 0 Stum­ble­Upon 0 LinkedIn 0 Email Email to a friend Buffer 0 Buffer 4 Flares ×

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge
Protected with IP Blacklist CloudIP Blacklist Cloud